JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 13, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jorge Eliecer Zarate Mejia Vs. Parques Nacionales Naturales De Colombia Y Finagro De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Once Penal Municipal De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado Tercero Del Circuito Judicial Administrativo De Bucaramanga. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Oficina Judicial Para Que Realice El Repectivo Reparto Entre El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bucaramanga O Al Tribunal Administrativo De Bucaramanga O Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Bucaramanga Para Que Asuma El Conocimiento De La Accion De Amparo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Jorge Eliecer Zarate Mejia contra Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia y FINAGRO de Colombia, a la Oficina Judicial de Bucaramanga con el fin de que realice el respectivo reparto entre el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga o al Tribunal Administrativo de Bucaramanga o al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Bucaramanga, quien debera asumir el conocimiento de la accion de amparo interpuesta por Jorge Eliecer Zarate Mejia contra Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia y FINAGRO de Colombia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado Once Penal Municipal de Bucaramanga y al Juzgado
  3. Tercero. del Circuito Judicial Administrativo de Bucaramanga, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.